thediplomat.com
By Raphael Rashid
October 07, 2025
White hat hackers exposed a systematic breach of South Korea’s digital backbone, but Seoul remains silent on the crisis.
“It was by accident,” Saber told The Diplomat when asked how the white hat hacker and their partner cyb0rg discovered what appears to be one of the most comprehensive known penetrations of the South Korean government’s digital infrastructure in recent memory.
The two independent security researchers, only identified by their pseudonyms, claim to have compromised a workstation they attributed to Kimsuky, North Korea’s state-sponsored cyber espionage group. They published their findings in August through the hacker magazine Phrack at the annual DEF CON hacker conference in Las Vegas.
Their 8.9GB data dump triggered intense debate about who was really behind the systematic breach of South Korea’s most sensitive systems, and how it could ever have happened.
What the Hackers Found
The leaked data shows deep, sustained access to South Korea’s government backbone. At the center is the Onnara system, the government’s operational platform that handles document, inter-ministry communications, and knowledge management across central and local agencies.
Technical evidence shows the operator maintained active access to Onnara with custom automation tools and session management capabilities. The dump also revealed compromised email credentials for multiple accounts at the Defense Counterintelligence Command, with phishing attacks continuing until just days before publication.
The breach extended across multiple government institutions. The data includes complete source code from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs’ email platform, alongside evidence of targeting the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office and compromising the Ministry of Unification through brute-force attacks against the ministry’s domain. The dump also contains thousands of GPKI digital certificates – the cryptographic keys securing official communications – along with cracked passwords that protected them.
Telecommunications were also hit. The dump shows access to LG Uplus and credential collections indicating penetration of KT’s infrastructure. These firms are two of South Korea’s three major telecom operators.
Overall, the operator maintained extensive phishing campaigns, malware, and vast credential databases spanning multiple sectors.
The Attribution Puzzle
Based on technical analysis, there is broad consensus that the operations were conducted from China. Browser histories show the operator repeatedly used Google Translate to convert Korean text into simplified Chinese and followed work schedules matching Chinese holidays. Researchers from Korea University’s Graduate School of Information Security found Chinese-language documentation across the operator’s systems, notes written in Chinese characters, and browsing patterns focused on Chinese security websites. Spur, which specializes in proxy infrastructure analysis, traced much of the activity to WgetCloud, a Chinese proxy service predominantly used by China-based users.
Michael “Barni” Barnhart from DTEX, who has extensively tracked North Korean operations, told The Diplomat that “the infrastructure and malware used in these operations do not align with known APT43 tradecraft,” referring to the industry designation for North Korea’s Kimsuky. “The technical signatures, deployment methods, and operational patterns diverge significantly from previously observed APT43 campaigns,” he added. His assessment pointed to linguistic elements in malware communications suggesting “a lower-tier PRC-aligned actor.”
S2W, a South Korean cybersecurity firm, assessed that the actor was “unlikely to be directly associated with the North Korea-linked threat group Kimsuky,” citing inconsistent operational patterns and different toolsets from known Kimsuky operations.
But experts remain sharply divided on who was actually controlling these China-based operations. Some believe Chinese actors were working independently for Chinese intelligence interests. Others point to potential China-North Korea collaboration, given the documented precedent of North Korean operations from Chinese territory. Proponents of this view include Saber, who told The Diplomat that they believe the hacked hacker “is a Chinese national working from China and for both Chinese and North Korean government interests.”
A third theory suggests North Korea outsourced operations to Chinese contractors. The workstation involved was configured for the Korean time zone and its targets aligned with Kimsuky’s traditional focus on South Korean government institutions, potentially suggesting North Korean direction despite Chinese execution.
Barnhart noted that APT43 “is not assessed to be in a position of intelligence scarcity that would necessitate outsourcing to non-DPRK entities,” though such arrangements might “more plausibly align with Russian interests.”
The fourth possibility involves sophisticated Chinese false flag operations designed to implicate North Korea while pursuing separate intelligence objectives.
Seoul’s Fragmented Response
South Korea’s response has focused on damage control rather than accountability, likely reflecting both the scale and sensitivity of the hack, especially given the China connection.
Presidential spokesperson Kang Yu-jung claimed “no accurate information” when questioned about the breaches, deflecting to the Ministry of National Defense (MND). The MND has yet to comment publicly on the incident. When The Diplomat approached the Korea Internet & Security Agency, the agency deflected to the Ministry of Science and ICT (MSIT).
When approached directly, MSIT issued a brief statement: “MSIT is responsible for cyber threat response in the private information and communications sector, so we ask for your understanding that it is difficult to answer your questions.”
The Ministry of Unification acknowledged the incident, stating it had been “aware of security vulnerabilities in advance through cooperation with related agencies and completed measures.” The ministry confirmed implementing “security education for all staff” and strengthening “operational system security measures” following the breach.
Professor Kim Seung-joo from Korea University has been a vocal critic of the government, highlighting the absence of a cybersecurity “control tower.” At a recent parliamentary hearing into the KT and LG Uplus breaches – which mirrored a separate breach of SK Telecom, the country’s largest telecoms company – Kim said, “Our country’s government needs to think about how our intelligence capabilities are not even as good as two foreign hackers.”
When asked whether the breach constituted a national security crisis beyond mere data theft, he replied, “Yes, I see it that way.”
Seoul’s muted response could reflect diplomatic sensitivities around potential Chinese involvement. President Lee Jae-myung’s “pragmatic” diplomacy has sought improved relations with Beijing, with bilateral summit talks under consideration when President Xi Jinping visits for the upcoming APEC leaders’ meeting at the end of October. Direct attribution to China could complicate these efforts.
Beyond the diplomatic angle, confirmation of the link to China could potentially inflame anti-China sentiment and conspiracy theories, which have manifested in recent far-right rallies. The government is keen to diffuse these narratives.
A Systematic Campaign
The government’s lack of response becomes more concerning when viewed alongside evidence of widespread penetration across South Korea’s critical infrastructure.
According to data obtained by lawmakers, there were over 9,000 cyber intrusion attempts against military networks in the first half of 2025 alone, up 36 percent from 2023.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare and its agencies also faced over half a million hacking attempts by August 2025, up 151 percent from 2022. The ministry has seen a staggering 4,813 percent increase in targeting compared to 2022.
Yet despite planned increases in overall cybersecurity spending for 2026, critics argue that the government’s record 35.3 trillion won R&D budget plan lacks dedicated cybersecurity categories, with security funding either embedded within other sectors or missing entirely.
The fragility of critical government infrastructure was demonstrated in September when a battery fire at the National Information Resources Service in Daejeon shut down 647 government systems – nearly one-third of all national information systems. The National Intelligence Service raised the cyber threat level as a result, citing fears hackers could exploit potential security gaps during recovery work ahead of the APEC leaders meeting.
These vulnerabilities may represent only the visible portion of a far more serious compromise. Evidence in the Phrack data dump seen by The Diplomat suggests the penetration likely extended to highly sensitive materials related to North Korea and intelligence gathering operations. Given that the obtained data pertains to only one workstation, the discovery potentially reveals a much wider breach, raising further questions about attribution, potential false flag operations, and the purpose of gaining such information.
When specifically questioned about access to such materials, the Ministry of Unification provided vague responses, stating it was “currently investigating with related agencies” without elaborating which ones or the scope of the potential compromise.
As investigations continue, the question of attribution remains complex, but the scale of compromise across both public and private sectors is becoming clear, representing a strategic failure with implications for national security and public confidence in critical infrastructure.
“Hopefully researchers will take a closer look at the dumps and better understand how these APTs harass citizens,” Saber said. “The world would be a better place without them.”
government.nl
On Tuesday, 30 September 2025, the Dutch Minister of Economic Affairs invoked the Goods Availability Act (Wet beschikbaarheid goederen) due to serious governance shortcomings at semiconductor manufacturer Nexperia. The company’s headquarters are located in Nijmegen, with additional subsidiaries in various countries around the world. The decision aims to prevent a situation in which the goods produced by Nexperia (finished and semi-finished products) would become unavailable in an emergency. The company’s regular production process can continue.
Reason for intervention under the Goods Availability Act
The Act has been invoked following recent and acute signals of serious governance shortcomings and actions within Nexperia. These signals posed a threat to the continuity and safeguarding on Dutch and European soil of crucial technological knowledge and capabilities. Losing these capabilities could pose a risk to Dutch and European economic security. Nexperia produces, among other things, chips used in the European automotive industry and in consumer electronics.
This measure is intended to mitigate that risk. On de basis of the order, company decisions may be blocked or reversed by the minister of Economic Affairs if they are (potentially) harmful to the interests of the company, to its future as a Dutch and European enterprise, and/or to the preservation of this critical value chain for Europe. The company’s regular production process can continue.
Invoking the Goods Availability Act by the Minister is highly exceptional. Only due to the significant scale and urgency of the governance deficiencies at Nexperia has the decision been made to apply the Act. This is a measure the government uses only when absolutely necessary. The application of this Act in this case is solely intended to prevent governance shortcomings at the specific company concerned and is not directed at other companies, the sector, or other countries. Parties may lodge an objection to this decision before the courts.
| CNN Politics edition.cnn.com
By Sean Lyngaas
Oct 8, 2025
Suspected Chinese government-backed hackers have breached computer systems of US law firm Williams & Connolly, which has represented some of America’s most powerful politicians, as part of a larger spying campaign against multiple law firms, according to a letter the firm sent clients and a source familiar with the hack.
The cyber intrusions have hit the email accounts of select attorneys at these law firms, as Beijing continues a broader effort to gather intelligence to support its multi-front competition with the US on issues ranging from national security to trade, multiple sources have told CNN.
The hackers in this case used a previously unknown software flaw, coveted by spies because it allows for stealth, to access Williams & Connolly’s computer network, said the letter sent to clients this week and reviewed by CNN. The letter did not name the hackers responsible, but the source familiar with the hack told CNN that Beijing was the prime suspect.
“Given the nature of the threat actor, we have no reason to believe that the data will be disclosed or used publicly,” the letter said, in a hint that the intruder was focused on espionage rather than extortion.
CNN has reached out to the Chinese Embassy in Washington, DC for comment.
Liu Pengyu, a spokesperson for the embassy, told CNN in response to a separate hacking allegation last month: “China firmly opposes and combats all forms of cyber attacks and cybercrime.”
It was not immediately clear which Williams & Connolly attorneys or clients were affected by the hack.
Williams & Connolly is known for its politically influential clientele and a storied bench of courtroom lawyers. The firm has represented Bill and Hillary Clinton; corporate clients, including tech, health care and media companies; and white-collar criminal defendants like Theranos founder Elizabeth Holmes.
A Williams & Connolly spokesperson declined to answer questions on who was responsible for the hack.
The hackers are “believed to be affiliated with a nation-state actor responsible for recent attacks on a number of law firms and companies,” Williams & Connolly said in a statement to CNN. “We have taken steps to block the threat actor, and there is now no evidence of any unauthorized traffic on our network.”
Another prominent US law firm hit by suspected Chinese hackers is Wiley Rein, CNN reported in July. With clients that span the Fortune 500, Wiley Rein is a powerful player in helping US companies and the government navigate the trade war with China.
The suspected Chinese hackers have been rampant in recent weeks, also hitting the cloud-computing firms that numerous American companies rely on to store key data, experts at Google-owned cybersecurity firm Mandiant have told CNN. In a sign of how important China’s hacking army is in the race for tech supremacy, the hackers have also stolen US tech firms’ proprietary software and used it to find new vulnerabilities to burrow deeper into networks, according to Mandiant.
The Chinese government routinely denies allegations that it conducts hacking operations, often pointing to alleged US operations targeting Chinese entities and accusing Washington of a “double standard.”
At any given time, the FBI has multiple investigations open into China’s elite hacking teams, which US officials consider the biggest state-backed cyber threat to American interests.
CNN has requested comment from the FBI.
“Law firms are prime targets for nation-state threat actors because of the complex, high-stakes issues they handle,” said Sean Koessel, co-founder of cybersecurity firm Volexity, which has investigated Chinese digital spying campaigns.
“Intellectual property, emerging technologies, international trade, sanctions, public policy, to name a few,” Koessel told CNN. “In short, they hold a wealth of sensitive, non-public information that can offer significant strategic advantage.”
nytimes.com
By Chris Buckley and Adam Goldman
Sept. 28, 2025
Fears of U.S. surveillance drove Xi Jinping, China’s leader, to elevate the agency and put it at the center of his cyber ambitions.
American officials were alarmed in 2023 when they discovered that Chinese state-controlled hackers had infiltrated critical U.S. infrastructure with malicious code that could wreck power grids, communications systems and water supplies. The threat was serious enough that William J. Burns, the director of the C.I.A., made a secret trip to Beijing to confront his Chinese counterpart.
He warned China’s minister of state security that there would be “serious consequences” for Beijing if it unleashed the malware. The tone of the meeting, details of which have not been previously reported, was professional and it appeared the message was delivered.
But since that meeting, which was described by two former U.S. officials, China’s intrusions have only escalated. (The former officials spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the sensitive meeting.)
American and European officials say China’s Ministry of State Security, the civilian spy agency often called the M.S.S., in particular, has emerged as the driving force behind China’s most sophisticated cyber operations.
In recent disclosures, officials revealed another immense, yearslong intrusion by hackers who have been collectively called Salt Typhoon, one that may have stolen information about nearly every American and targeted dozens of other countries. Some countries hit by Salt Typhoon warned in an unusual statement that the data stolen could provide Chinese intelligence services with the capability to “identify and track their targets’ communications and movements around the world.”
The attack underscored how the Ministry of State Security has evolved into a formidable cyberespionage agency capable of audacious operations that can evade detection for years, experts said.
For decades, China has used for-hire hackers to break into computer networks and systems. These operatives sometimes mixed espionage with commercial data theft or were sloppy, exposing their presence. In the recent operation by Salt Typhoon, however, intruders linked to the M.S.S. found weaknesses in systems, burrowed into networks, spirited out data, hopped between compromised systems and erased traces of their presence.
“Salt Typhoon shows a highly skilled and strategic side to M.S.S. cyber operations that has been missed with the attention on lower-quality contract hackers,” said Alex Joske, the author of a book on the ministry.
For Washington, the implication of China’s growing capability is clear: In a future conflict, China could put U.S. communications, power and infrastructure at risk.
China’s biggest hacking campaigns have been “strategic operations” intended to intimidate and deter rivals, said Nigel Inkster, a senior adviser for cybersecurity and China at the International Institute for Strategic Studies in London.
“If they succeed in remaining on these networks undiscovered, that potentially gives them a significant advantage in the event of a crisis,” said Mr. Inkster, formerly director of operations and intelligence in the British Secret Intelligence Service, MI6. “If their presence is — as it has been — discovered, it still exercises a very significant deterrent effect; as in, ‘Look what we could do to you if we wanted.’”
The Rise of the M.S.S.
China’s cyber advances reflect decades of investment to try to match, and eventually rival, the U.S. National Security Agency and Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters, or GCHQ.
China’s leaders founded the Ministry of State Security in 1983 mainly to track dissidents and perceived foes of Communist Party rule. The ministry engaged in online espionage but was long overshadowed by the Chinese military, which ran extensive cyberspying operations.
After taking power as China’s top leader in 2012, Xi Jinping moved quickly to reshape the M.S.S. He seemed unsettled by the threat of U.S. surveillance to China’s security, and in a 2013 speech pointed to the revelations of Edward J. Snowden, the former U.S. intelligence contractor.
Mr. Xi purged the ministry of senior officials accused of corruption and disloyalty. He reined in the hacking role of the Chinese military, elevating the ministry as the country’s primary cyberespionage agency. He put national security at the core of his agenda with new laws and by establishing a new commission.
“At this same time, the intelligence requirements imposed on the security apparatus start to multiply, because Xi wanted to do more things abroad and at home,” said Matthew Brazil, a senior analyst at BluePath Labs who has co-written a history of China’s espionage services.
Since around 2015, the M.S.S. has moved to bring its far-flung provincial offices under tighter central control, said experts. Chen Yixin, the current minister, has demanded that local state security offices follow Beijing’s orders without delay. Security officials, he said on a recent inspection of the northeast, must be both “red and expert” — absolutely loyal to the party while also adept in technology.
“It all essentially means that the Ministry of State Security now sits atop a system in which it can move its pieces all around the chessboard,” said Edward Schwarck, a researcher at the University of Oxford who is writing a dissertation on China’s state security.
Mr. Chen was the official who met with Mr. Burns in May 2023. He gave nothing away when confronted with the details of the cyber campaign, telling Mr. Burns he would let his superiors know about the U.S. concerns, the former officials said.
The Architect of China’s Cyber Power
The Ministry of State Security operates largely in the shadows, its officials rarely seen or named in public. There was one exception: Wu Shizhong, who was a senior official in Bureau 13, the “technical reconnaissance” arm of the ministry.
Mr. Wu was unusually visible, turning up at meetings and conferences in his other role as director of the China Information Technology Security Evaluation Center. Officially, the center vets digital software and hardware for security vulnerabilities before it can be used in China. Unofficially, foreign officials and experts say, the center comes under the control of the M.S.S. and provided a direct pipeline of information about vulnerabilities and hacking talent.
Mr. Wu has not publicly said he served in the security ministry, but a Chinese university website in 2005 described him as a state security bureau head in a notice about a meeting, and investigations by Crowd Strike and other cybersecurity firms have also described his state security role.
“Wu Shizhong is widely recognized as a leading figure in the creation of M.S.S. cyber capabilities,” said Mr. Joske.
In 2013, Mr. Wu pointed to two lessons for China: Mr. Snowden’s disclosures about American surveillance and the use by the United States of a virus to sabotage Iran’s nuclear facilities. “The core of cyber offense and defense capabilities is technical prowess,” he said, stressing the need to control technologies and exploit their weaknesses. China, he added, should create “a national cyber offense and defense apparatus.”
China’s commercial tech sector boomed in the years that followed, and state security officials learned how to put domestic companies and contractors to work, spotting and exploiting flaws and weak spots in computer systems, several cybersecurity experts said. The U.S. National Security Agency has also hoarded knowledge of software flaws for its own use. But China has an added advantage: It can tap its own tech companies to feed information to the state.
“M.S.S. was successful at improving the talent pipeline and the volume of good offensive hackers they could contract to,” said Dakota Cary, a researcher who focuses on China’s efforts to develop its hacking capabilities at SentinelOne. “This gives them a significant pipeline for offensive tools.”
The Chinese government also imposed rules requiring that any newly found software vulnerabilities be reported first to a database that analysts say is operated by the M.S.S., giving security officials early access. Other policies reward tech firms with payments if they meet monthly quotas of finding flaws in computer systems and submitting them to the state security-controlled database.
“It’s a prestige thing and it’s good for a company’s reputation,” Mei Danowski, the co-founder of Natto Thoughts, a company that advises clients on cyber threats, said of the arrangement. “These business people don’t feel like they are doing something wrong. They feel like they are doing something for their country.”
| CyberScoop By
Tim Starks
September 10, 202
Major cyber intrusions by the Chinese hacking groups known as Salt Typhoon and Volt Typhoon have forced the FBI to change its methods of hunting sophisticated threats, a top FBI cyber official said Wednesday.
U.S. officials, allied governments and threat researchers have identified Salt Typhoon as the group behind the massive telecommunications hack revealed last fall but that could have been ongoing for years. Investigators have pointed at Volt Typhoon as a group that has infiltrated critical infrastructure to cause disruptions in the United States if China invades Taiwan and Americans intervene.
Those hacks were stealthier than in the past, and more patient, said Jason Bilnoski, deputy assistant director of the FBI’s cyber division. The Typhoons have focused on persistent access and gotten better at hiding their infiltration by using “living off the land” techniques that involve using legitimate tools within systems to camouflage their efforts, he said. That in turn has complicated FBI efforts to share indicators of compromise (IOCs).
“We’re having to now hunt as if they’re already on the network, and we’re hunting in ways we hadn’t before,” he said at the Billington Cybersecurity Summit. “They’re not dropping tools and malware that we used to see, and perhaps there’s not a lot of IOCs that we’d be able to share in certain situations.”
The hackers used to be “noisy,” with an emphasis on hitting a target quickly, stealing data and then escaping, Bilnoski said. But now for nation-backed attackers, “we’re watching exponential leaps” in tactics, techniques and procedures, he said.
Jermaine Roebuck, associate director for threat hunting at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, said his agency is also seeing those kinds of changes in the level of stealth from sophisticated hackers, in addition to “a significant change” in their intentions and targeting.
“We saw a lot of espionage over the last several years, but here lately, there’s been a decided shift into computer network attack, prepositioning or disruption in terms of capabilities,” he said at the same conference.
The targeting has changed as organizations, including government agencies, have shifted to the cloud. “Well, guess what?” he asked. “The actors are going toward the cloud” in response.
They’ve also focused on “edge devices,” like devices that supply virtual private network connections or other services provided by managed service providers, Roebuck said. Organizations have less insight into the attacks those devices and providers are facing than more direct intrusions, he said.
Huawei has already ‘built an ecosystem entirely independent of the United States’, according to a senior executive.
South China Morning Post scmp.com Coco Fengin Guangdong
Published: 9:00pm, 29 Aug 2025
China has virtually overcome crippling US tech restrictions, according to a senior executive at Huawei Technologies, as mainland-developed computing infrastructure, AI systems and other software now rival those from the world’s largest economy.
Shenzhen-based Huawei, which was added to Washington’s trade blacklist in May 2019, has already “built an ecosystem entirely independent of the United States”, said Tao Jingwen, president of the firm’s quality, business process and information technology management department, at an event on Wednesday in Guiyang, capital of southwestern Guizhou province.
Tao highlighted the privately held company’s resilience at the event, as he discussed some of the latest milestones in its journey towards tech self-sufficiency.
That industry-wide commitment to tech self-reliance would enable China to “surpass the US in terms of artificial intelligence applications” on the back of the country’s “extensive economy and business scenarios”, he said.
His remarks reflected Huawei’s efforts to surmount tightened US control measures and heightened geopolitical tensions, as the company pushes the boundaries in semiconductors, computing power, cloud services, AI and operating systems.
Tao’s presentation was made on the same day that Huawei said users of token services on its cloud platform had access to its CloudMatrix 384 system, which is a cluster of 384 Ascend AI processors – spread across 12 computing cabinets and four bus cabinets – that delivers 300 petaflops of computing power and 48 terabytes of high-bandwidth memory. A petaflop is 1,000 trillion calculations per second.
ncsc.gov.uk The NCSC and international partners share technical details of malicious activities and urge organisations to take mitigative actions.
GCHQ’s National Cyber Security Centre and international partners link three China-based companies to campaign targeting foreign governments and critical networks.
Commercial cyber ecosystem with links to the Chinese intelligence services has enabled global malicious activity.
New advisory supports UK organisations in critical sectors bolster their security against China state-sponsored cyber activity
Network defenders urged to proactively hunt for activity and take steps to mitigate threat from attackers exploiting avoidable weaknesses
The UK and international allies have today (Wednesday) publicly linked three technology companies based in China with a global malicious cyber campaign targeting critical networks.
In a new advisory published today, the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) – a part of GCHQ - and international partners from twelve other countries have shared technical details about how malicious cyber activities linked with these China-based commercial entities have targeted nationally significant organisations around the world.
Since at least 2021, this activity has targeted organisations in critical sectors including government, telecommunications, transportation, lodging, and military infrastructure globally, with a cluster of activity observed in the UK.
The activities described in the advisory partially overlaps with campaigns previously reported by the cyber security industry most commonly under the name Salt Typhoon.
The data stolen through this activity can ultimately provide the Chinese intelligence services the capability to identify and track targets’ communications and movements worldwide.
The advisory describes how the threat actors have had considerable success taking advantage of known common vulnerabilities rather than relying on bespoke malware or zero-day vulnerabilities to carry out their activities, meaning attacks via these vectors could have been avoided with timely patching.
Organisations of national significance in the UK are encouraged to proactively hunt for malicious activity and implement mitigative actions, including ensuring that edge devices are not exposed to known vulnerabilities and implementing security updates.
NCSC Chief Executive Dr Richard Horne said:
“We are deeply concerned by the irresponsible behaviour of the named commercial entities based in China that has enabled an unrestrained campaign of malicious cyber activities on a global scale.
“It is crucial organisations in targeted critical sectors heed this international warning about the threat posed by cyber actors who have been exploiting publicly known – and so therefore fixable – vulnerabilities.
“In the face of sophisticated threats, network defenders must proactively hunt for malicious activity, as well as apply recommended mitigations based on indicators of compromise and regularly reviewing network device logs for signs of unusual activity.”
The UK has led globally in helping to improve cyber risk management with leading legislation including the Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 and the associated Code of Practice, for which the NCSC was the technical authority.
The government's forthcoming Cyber Security and Resilience Bill will further strengthen the UK’s cyber defences, protecting the services the public rely on to go about their normal lives.
The NCSC and government partners have previously warned about the growing range of cyber threats facing critical sectors and provides a range of guidance and resources to improve resilience.
The NCSC's Early Warning service provides timely notifications about potential security issues, including known vulnerabilities, and malicious activities affecting users’ networks. All UK organisations can sign up to this free service.
The three China-based technology companies provide cyber-related services to the Chinese intelligence services and are part of a wider commercial ecosystem in China, which includes information security companies, data brokers and hackers for hire.
The named entities are: Sichuan Juxinhe Network Technology Co Ltd, Beijing Huanyu Tianqiong Information Technology Co, and Sichuan Zhixin Ruijie Network Technology Co Ltd.
The NCSC has co-sealed this advisory alongside agencies from the United States, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Poland and Spain.
nltimes.nl/ Thursday, 28 August 2025 - 12:50 -
Dutch intelligence agencies confirmed on Thursday that the country was targeted in the global cyberespionage campaign carried out by the Chinese state-linked hacker group Salt Typhoon. The campaign, which came to light in late 2024, focused on the international telecommunications sector.
The Dutch Military Intelligence and Security Service (MIVD) and the General Intelligence and Security Service (AIVD) said they independently verified portions of a U.S. investigation attributing the campaign to Salt Typhoon. “We can confirm parts of the U.S. findings through our own intelligence,” the agencies stated.
The warning aligns with alerts issued by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), and Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), as well as European intelligence services including Germany’s BND, Finland’s SUPO, the U.K.’s NCSC, and Italy’s AISE.
In the Netherlands, the targets were smaller Internet service and hosting providers rather than the major telecom operators. Investigations by the MIVD and AIVD indicate that the hackers gained access to routers of Dutch targets but, as far as is known, did not penetrate internal networks further. Where possible, the agencies and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) shared threat information with affected organizations.
The agencies emphasized that China’s cyber activities have become increasingly sophisticated. “These activities are now so advanced that continuous effort and attention are needed to detect and counter cyber operations against Dutch interests,” the MIVD and AIVD said. They added that while proactive measures can reduce risk, complete prevention is not possible, posing a significant challenge to national cyber resilience
South China Morning Post scmp.com Published: 5:00pm, 12 Aug 2025 - Chinese tech firms are leveraging software improvements to compensate for limited access to advanced hardware.
Huawei Technologies has unveiled a software tool designed to accelerate inference in large artificial intelligence models, an advancement that could help China reduce its reliance on expensive high-bandwidth memory (HBM) chips.
Unified Cache Manager (UCM) is an algorithm that allocates data according to varying latency requirements across different types of memories – including ultra-fast HBM, standard dynamic random access memory and solid-state drive – thereby enhancing inference efficiency, according to Huawei executives at the Financial AI Reasoning Application Landing and Development Forum in Shanghai on Tuesday.
Zhou Yuefeng, vice-president and head of Huawei’s data storage product line, said UCM demonstrated its effectiveness during tests, reducing inference latency by up to 90 per cent and increasing system throughput as much as 22-fold.
The move exemplifies how Chinese tech firms are leveraging software improvements to compensate for limited access to advanced hardware. Earlier this year, Chinese start-up DeepSeek captured global attention by developing powerful AI models with constrained chip resources.
Huawei plans to open-source UCM in September, first in its online developer community and later to the broader industry. The initiative could help China lessen its dependence on foreign-made HBM chips, a market mostly controlled by South Korea’s SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics, as well as the US supplier Micron Technology.
HBM is a stacked, high-speed, low-latency memory that provides substantial data throughput to AI chips, enabling optimal performance. The global HBM market is projected to nearly double in revenue this year, reaching US$34 billion, and is expected to hit US$98 billion by 2030, largely driven by the AI boom, according to consulting firm Yole Group.
theregister.com 21.08.2025 - Better late than never after SharePoint assault?
Microsoft has reportedly stopped giving Chinese companies proof-of-concept exploit code for soon-to-be-disclosed vulnerabilities following last month's SharePoint zero-day attacks, which appear to be related to a leak in Redmond's early-bug-notification program.
The software behemoth gives some software vendors early bug disclosures under its Microsoft Active Protections Program (MAPP), which typically delivers info two weeks before Patch Tuesday. MAPP participants sign a non-disclosure agreement, and in exchange get vulnerability details so that they can provide updated protections to customers more quickly.
According to Microsoft spokesperson David Cuddy, who spoke with Bloomberg about changes to the program, MAPP has begun limiting access to companies in "countries where they're required to report vulnerabilities to their governments," including China. Companies in these countries will no longer receive "proof of concept" exploit code, but instead will see "a more general written description" that Microsoft sends at the same time as patches, Cuddy told the news outlet.
Microsoft did not respond to The Register's inquiries.
In late July, China-based crews – including government goons, data thieves, and a ransomware gang – exploited a couple of bugs that allowed them to hijack on-premises SharePoint servers belonging to more than 400 organizations and remotely execute code.
Redmond disclosed the two SharePoint flaws during its July 8 Patch Tuesday event, and a couple weeks later admitted that the software update didn't fully fix the issues. The Windows giant issued working patches on July 21 to address its earlier flawed fixes, but by then the bugs were already under mass exploitation.
This led some to speculate that whomever was exploiting the CVEs knew about them in advance – and also knew how to bypass the original patches.
"A leak happened here somewhere," Dustin Childs, head of threat awareness at Trend Micro's Zero Day Initiative (ZDI), told The Register in July. "And now you've got a zero-day exploit in the wild, and worse than that, you've got a zero-day exploit in the wild that bypasses the patch, which came out the next day."
One possible explanation: Someone leaked details from the MAPP update to Beijing.
Childs said ZDI was able to poke holes in the initial patches. China does not lack talented security researchers capable of doing likewise.
At the time, Microsoft declined to answer The Register's specific questions about what role, if any, MAPP played in the SharePoint attacks. "As part of our standard process, we'll review this incident, find areas to improve, and apply those improvements broadly," a Microsoft spokesperson told us in July.
Microsoft today declined to comment on its internal investigation.
Childs today told The Register that the MAPP change "is a positive change, if a bit late. Anything Microsoft can do to help prevent leaks while still offering MAPP guidance is welcome."
"In the past, MAPP leaks were associated with companies out of China, so restricting information from flowing to these companies should help," Childs said. "The MAPP program remains a valuable resource for network defenders. Hopefully, Microsoft can squelch the leaks while sending out the needed information to companies that have proven their ability (and desire) to protect end users."
euractiv.com - MADRID – Spanish magistrates, law enforcement leaders and opposition politicians are voicing alarm over Madrid’s unusually close ties to Beijing, as the Chinese tech giant’s footprint in Spain’s public sector is deeper than first thought.
The concerns have intensified since July, when reports surfaced of an alleged €12.3 million contract between 2021 and 2025 for Huawei to store sensitive judicial wiretap data for the interior ministry.
Opposition Popular Party (PP) secretary general Miguel Tellado branded the public tender “shady” and claimed it was part of “the Chinese branch of Pedro Sánchez’s enormous corruption network.” The PP is also demanding that Sánchez’s top ministers testify before parliament after the summer recess.
The interior ministry has denied the existence of the Huawei agreement and did not clarify whether the initial €12.3 million figure was part of a broader deal with Spanish firms such as Telefónica, TRC or Econocom, as several local outlets have suggested.
The alleged deal has landed at a politically delicate moment for the Socialist-led government, already reeling from multiple corruption scandals.
nytimes.com - Documents examined by researchers show how one company in China has collected data on members of Congress and other influential Americans.
The Chinese government is using companies with expertise in artificial intelligence to monitor and manipulate public opinion, giving it a new weapon in information warfare, according to current and former U.S. officials and documents unearthed by researchers.
One company’s internal documents show how it has undertaken influence campaigns in Hong Kong and Taiwan, and collected data on members of Congress and other influential Americans.
While the firm has not mounted a campaign in the United States, American spy agencies have monitored its activity for signs that it might try to influence American elections or political debates, former U.S. officials said.
Artificial intelligence is increasingly the new frontier of espionage and malign influence operations, allowing intelligence services to conduct campaigns far faster, more efficiently and on a larger scale than ever before.
The Chinese government has long struggled to mount information operations targeting other countries, lacking the aggressiveness or effectiveness of Russian intelligence agencies. But U.S. officials and experts say that advances in A.I. could help China overcome its weaknesses.
A new technology can track public debates of interest to the Chinese government, offering the ability to monitor individuals and their arguments as well as broader public sentiment. The technology also has the promise of mass-producing propaganda that can counter shifts in public opinion at home and overseas.
China’s emerging capabilities come as the U.S. government pulls back efforts to counter foreign malign influence campaigns.
U.S. spy agencies still collect information about foreign manipulation, but the Trump administration has dismantled the teams at the State Department, the F.B.I. and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency that warned the public about potential threats. In the last presidential election, the campaigns included Russian videos denigrating Vice President Kamala Harris and falsely claiming that ballots had been destroyed.
The new technology allows the Chinese company GoLaxy to go beyond the election influence campaigns undertaken by Russia in recent years, according to the documents.
In a statement, GoLaxy denied that it was creating any sort of “bot network or psychological profiling tour” or that it had done any work related to Hong Kong or other elections. It called the information presented by The New York Times about the company “misinformation.”
“GoLaxy’s products are mainly based on open-source data, without specially collecting data targeting U.S. officials,” the firm said.
After being contacted by The Times, GoLaxy began altering its website, removing references to its national security work on behalf of the Chinese government.
The documents examined by researchers appear to have been leaked by a disgruntled employee upset about wages and working conditions at the company. While most of the documents are not dated, the majority of those that include dates are from 2020, 2022 and 2023. They were obtained by Vanderbilt University’s Institute of National Security, a nonpartisan research and educational center that studies cybersecurity, intelligence and other critical challenges.
Publicly, GoLaxy advertises itself as a firm that gathers data and analyzes public sentiment for Chinese companies and the government. But in the documents, which were reviewed by The Times, the company privately claims that it can use a new technology to reshape and influence public opinion on behalf of the Chinese government.
france24.com - Chinese authorities summoned Nvidia representatives on Thursday to discuss "serious security issues" over some of its artificial intelligence chips, as the US tech giant finds itself entangled in trade tensions between Beijing and Washington.
Nvidia is a world-leading producer of AI semiconductors, but the United States effectively restricts which chips it can export to China on national security grounds.
A key issue has been Chinese access to the "H20", a less powerful version of Nvidia's AI processing units that the company developed specifically for export to China.
The California-based firm said this month it would resume H20 sales to China after Washington pledged to remove licensing curbs that had halted exports.
But the firm still faces obstacles -- US lawmakers have proposed plans to require Nvidia and other manufacturers of advanced AI chips to include built-in location tracking capabilities.
And Beijing's top internet regulator said Thursday it had summoned Nvidia representatives to discuss recently discovered "serious security issues" involving the H20.
The Cyberspace Administration of China said it had asked Nvidia to "explain the security risks of vulnerabilities and backdoors in its H20 chips sold to China and submit relevant supporting materials".
The statement posted on social media noted that, according to US experts, location tracking and remote shutdown technologies for Nvidia chips "are already matured".
The announcement marked the latest complication for Nvidia in selling its advanced products in the key Chinese market, where it is in increasingly fierce competition with homegrown technology firms.
Nvidia committed
CEO Jensen Huang said during a closely watched visit to Beijing this month that his firm remained committed to serving local customers.
Huang said he had been assured during talks with top Chinese officials during the trip that the country was "open and stable".
"They want to know that Nvidia continues to invest here, that we are still doing our best to serve the market here," he said.
Nvidia this month became the first company to hit $4 trillion in market value -- a new milestone in Wall Street's bet that AI will transform the global economy.
Jost Wubbeke of the Sinolytics consultancy told AFP the move by China to summon Nvidia was "not surprising in the sense that targeting individual US companies has become a common tool in the context of US-China tensions".
"What is surprising, however, is the timing," he noted, after the two countries agreed to further talks to extend their trade truce.
"China's action may signal a shift toward a more assertive stance," Wubbeke said.
Beijing is also aiming to reduce reliance on foreign tech by promoting Huawei's domestically developed 910C chip as an alternative to the H20, he added.
"From that perspective, the US decision to allow renewed exports of the H20 to China could be seen as counterproductive, as it might tempt Chinese hyperscalers to revert to the H20, potentially undermining momentum behind the 910C and other domestic alternatives."
New hurdles to Nvidia's operation in China come as the country's economy wavers, beset by a years-long property sector crisis and heightened trade headwinds under US President Donald Trump.
Chinese President Xi Jinping has called for the country to enhance self-reliance in certain areas deemed vital for national security -- including AI and semiconductors -- as tensions with Washington mount.
The country's firms have made great strides in recent years, with Huang praising their "super-fast" innovation during his visit to Beijing this month.
therecord.media 04.08 - Researchers have discovered more than 10 patents for powerful offensive cybersecurity technologies filed by a prominent Chinese company allegedly involved in Beijing’s Silk Typhoon campaign.
Researchers have discovered more than 10 patents for powerful offensive cybersecurity technologies filed by a prominent Chinese company allegedly involved in Beijing’s Silk Typhoon campaign.
SentinelOne's threat researchers pored through recent Justice Department indictments of prominent Chinese hackers and mapped out the country’s evolving web of private companies that are hired to launch cyberattacks on behalf of the government.
The report focuses on intellectual property rights filings by Shanghai Firetech, a company the DOJ said works on behalf of the Shanghai State Security Bureau (SSSB). The company was allegedly involved in many of the Silk Typhoon attacks and was previously identified as part of the Hafnium attacks seen in 2021.
The researchers found previously unseen patents on offensive technologies tied to Shanghai Firetech, SentinelLabs expert Dakota Cary told Recorded Future News.
The findings suggest the company “serves other offensive missions not tied to the Hafnium cluster,” he said.
“The company also has patents on a variety of offensive tools that suggest the capability to monitor individual's homes, like ‘intelligent home appliances analysis platform,’ ‘long-range household computer network intelligentized control software,’ and ‘intelligent home appliances evidence collection software’ which could support surveillance of individuals abroad.”
Cary noted that intelligence agencies like the CIA are known to use similar tools.
Shanghai Firetech also filed patents for software for “remote” evidence collection, and for targeting routers and Apple devices, among other uses.
The patent for Apple computers stood out to the researchers because it allows actors to remotely recover files from devices and was not previously documented as a capability of any Hafnium-related threat actor.
SentinelLabs said the technologies “offer strong, often previously unreported offensive capabilities, from acquisition of encrypted endpoint data, mobile forensics, to collecting traffic from network devices.”
The Justice Department indicted two prominent hackers this month — Xu Zewei and Zhang Yu — that are accused of working with China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) and its Shanghai bureau. The indictments said Xu and Zhang worked for two firms previously unattributed in the public domain to the Hafnium/Silk Typhoon group.
Xu was arrested after flying into Milan on July 3, and prosecutors accused both men of being deeply involved in China’s cyberattacks on institutions working on COVID-19 vaccines throughout 2020 and 2021. The DOJ obtained emails from Xu to the Shanghai security bureau confirming he had acquired the contents of the COVID-19 researchers’ mailboxes.
channelnewsasia.com - The decision to identify cyber threat group UNC3886 was because Singaporeans “ought to know about it” given the seriousness of the threat, said the minister.
SINGAPORE: While naming a specific country linked to cyber threat group UNC3886 is not in Singapore’s interest at this point in time, the attack was still serious enough for the government to let the public know about the group, said Coordinating Minister for National Security and Minister for Home Affairs K Shanmugam on Friday (Aug 1).
Speaking to reporters on the side of the Cyber Security Agency of Singapore’s (CSA) Exercise Cyber Star, the national cybersecurity crisis management exercise, Mr Shanmugam said that when it comes to naming any country responsible for a cyber attack, “we always think about it very carefully”.
Responding to a question from CNA on reports tying the group to China, Mr Shanmugam said: “Media coverage (and) industry experts all attribute UNC3886 to some country … Government does not comment on this.
“We release information that we assess is in the public interest. Naming a specific country is not in our interest at this point in time.”
UNC3886 has been described by Google-owned cybersecurity firm Mandiant as a "China-nexus espionage group" that has targeted prominent strategic organisations on a global scale.
Mr Shanmugam had announced on Jul 18 that Singapore is actively dealing with a "highly sophisticated threat actor" that is attacking critical infrastructure, identifying the entity as UNC3886 without disclosing if it was a state-linked actor.
He said the threat actor poses a serious danger to Singapore and could undermine the country's national security, and added that it was not in Singapore's security interests to disclose further details of the attack then.
When asked the following day about UNC3886's alleged links to China and possible retaliation for naming them, Mr Shanmugam, who is also Home Affairs Minister, said this was "speculative".
"Who they are linked to and how they operate is not something I want to go into," he said.
Responding to media reports in a Jul 19 Facebook post, the Chinese embassy in Singapore expressed its "strong dissatisfaction" at the claims linking the country to UNC3886, stating that they were "groundless smears and accusations against China".
“In fact, China is a major victim of cyberattacks," it wrote.
"The embassy would like to reiterate that China is firmly against and cracks down (on) all forms of cyberattacks in accordance with law. China does not encourage, support or condone hacking activities."
On Friday, Mr Shanmugam also gave his reasons for disclosing the identity of threat actors like UNC3886.
“We look at the facts of each case (and) the degree of confidence we have before we can name. And when we decide to name the threat actor, we look at whether it is in Singapore's best interest,” said Mr Shanmugam, who is also the home affairs minister.
In this case, the threat, attack and compromise to Singapore’s infrastructure was “serious enough” and the government was confident enough to name UNC3886 as the perpetrators, he said.
“Here, we said this is serious. They have gotten in. They are compromising a very serious critical infrastructure. Singaporeans ought to know about it, and awareness has got to increase. And because of the seriousness, it is in the public interest for us to disclose,” said Mr Shanmugam.
scmp.com - The new virtual ID scheme has been in the beta stage since a draft regulation was launched in July last year.
China has officially introduced a controversial national cyber ID system, despite concerns from some experts and netizens over privacy and censorship.
The system aims to “protect the security of citizens’ identity information”, according to regulations that went into effect on Tuesday, backed by the Ministry of Public Security, the Cyberspace Administration of China, and four other authorities.
The app, whose beta version was launched last year, issues an encrypted virtual ID composed of random letters and digits so the person’s real name and ID number are not given to websites when verifying accounts. So far, it is not-mandatory for internet users to apply for the cyber ID.
Starting in 2017, Beijing started ordering online platforms to adopt real-name registration for applications such as instant messaging, microblogs, online forums and other websites that ask netizens to submit their ID numbers. Separately, official ID has been required to register a mobile phone number in China since 2010.
In the summer of 2005, Tan Dailin was a 20-year-old grad student at Sichuan University of Science and Engineering when he came to the attention of the People’s Liberation Army of China.
Tan was part of a burgeoning hacker community known as the Honkers—teens and twentysomethings in late-’90s and early-’00s China who formed groups like the Green Army and Evil Octal and launched patriotic cyberattacks against Western targets they deemed disrespectful to China. The attacks were low-sophistication—mostly website defacements and denial-of-service operations targeting entities in the US, Taiwan, and Japan—but the Honkers advanced their skills over time, and Tan documented his escapades in blog posts. After publishing about hacking targets in Japan, the PLA came calling.
The subsequent timeline of events is unclear, but Tan, who went by the hacker handles Wicked Rose and Withered Rose, then launched his own hacking group—the Network Crack Program Hacker (NCPH). The group quickly gained notoriety for winning hacking contests and developing hacking tools. They created the GinWui rootkit, one of China’s first homegrown remote-access backdoors and then, experts believe, used it and dozens of zero-day exploits they wrote in a series of “unprecedented” hacks against US companies and government entities over the spring and summer of 2006. They did this on behalf of the PLA, according to Adam Kozy, who tracked Tan and other Chinese hackers for years as a former FBI analyst who now heads the SinaCyber consulting firm, focused on China.
Tan revealed online at the time that he and his team were being paid about $250 a month for their hacking, though he didn’t say who paid or what they hacked. The pay increased to $1,000 a month after their summer hacking spree, according to a 2007 report by former threat intelligence firm VeriSign iDefense.
At some point, Tan switched teams and began contracting for the Ministry of State Security (MSS), China’s civilian intelligence agency, as part of its notorious hacking group known as APT 41. And in 2020, when Tan was 36, the US Justice Department announced indictments against him and other alleged APT 41 members for hacking more than 100 targets, including US government systems, health care organizations, and telecoms.
Tan’s path to APT 41 isn’t unique. He’s just one of many former Honkers who began their careers as self-directed patriotic hackers before being absorbed by the state into its massive spying apparatus.
Not a lot has been written about the Honkers and their critical role in China’s APT operations, outside of congressional testimony Kozy gave in 2022. But a new report, published this month by Eugenio Benincasa, senior cyberdefense researcher at the Center for Security Studies at ETH Zürich university in Switzerland, expands on Kozy’s work to track the Honkers’ early days and how this group of skilled youths became some of China’s most prolific cyberspies.
“This is not just about [Honkers] creating a hacker culture that was implicitly aligned with national security goals,” Benincasa says, “but also the personal relations they created [that] we still see reflected in the APTs today.”
Early Days
The Honker community largely began when China joined the internet in 1994, and a network connecting universities and research centers across the country for knowledge-sharing put Chinese students online before the rest of the country. Like US hackers, the Honkers were self-taught tech enthusiasts who flocked to electronic bulletin boards (dial-up forums) to share programming and computer hacking tips. They soon formed groups like Xfocus, China Eagle Union, and The Honker Union of China and came to be known as Red Hackers or Honkers, a name derived from the Mandarin word “hong,” for red, and “heike,” for dark visitor—the Chinese term for hacker.
lookout.com - Massistant is a mobile forensics application used by law enforcement in China to collect extensive information from mobile devices.
Researchers at the Lookout Threat Lab have discovered a mobile forensics application named Massistant, used by law enforcement in China to collect extensive information from mobile devices. This application is believed to be the successor to a previously reported forensics tool named “MFSocket” used by state police and reported by various media outlets in 2019. These samples require physical access to the device to install, and were not distributed through the Google Play store.
Forensics tools are used by law enforcement personnel to collect sensitive data from a device confiscated by customs officials, at local or provincial border checkpoints or when stopped by law enforcement officers.
These tools can pose a risk to enterprise organizations with executives and employees that travel abroad - especially to countries with border patrol policies that allow them to confiscate mobile devices for a short period of time upon entry. In 2024, the Ministry of State Security introduced new legislation that would allow law enforcement personnel to collect and analyze devices without a warrant. There have been anecdotal reports of Chinese law enforcement collecting and analyzing the devices of business travellers. In some cases, researchers have discovered persistent, headless surveillance modules on devices confiscated and then returned by law enforcement such that mobile device activity can continue to be monitored even after the device has been returned.
WASHINGTON, July 15 (Reuters) - A U.S. state's Army National Guard network was thoroughly hacked by a Chinese cyberespionage group nicknamed "Salt Typhoon," according to a Department of Homeland Security memo.
The memo obtained by Property of the People, a national security transparency nonprofit, said the hackers "extensively compromised" the unnamed state Army National Guard's network between March and December 2024 and exfiltrated maps and "data traffic" with counterparts' networks in "every other US state and at least four US territories."
he National Guard and the Department of Homeland Security's cyber defense arm, CISA, did not immediately return messages. News of the memo was first reported by NBC News.
Salt Typhoon has emerged as one of the top concerns of American cyber defhen Coatesenders. U.S. officials allege that the hacking group is doing more than just gathering intelligence; it is prepositioning itself to paralyze U.S. critical infrastructure in case of a conflict with China. Beijing has repeatedly denied being behind the intrusions.
The memo, which said it drew on reporting from the Pentagon, said that Salt Typhoon's success in compromising states' Army National Guard networks nationwide "could undermine local cybersecurity efforts to protect critical infrastructure," in part because such units are often "integrated with state fusion centers responsible for sharing threat information—including cyber threats."
propublica.org - The Pentagon bans foreign citizens from accessing highly sensitive data, but Microsoft bypasses this by using engineers in China and elsewhere to remotely instruct American “escorts” who may lack expertise to identify malicious code.
Microsoft is using engineers in China to help maintain the Defense Department’s computer systems — with minimal supervision by U.S. personnel — leaving some of the nation’s most sensitive data vulnerable to hacking from its leading cyber adversary, a ProPublica investigation has found.
The arrangement, which was critical to Microsoft winning the federal government’s cloud computing business a decade ago, relies on U.S. citizens with security clearances to oversee the work and serve as a barrier against espionage and sabotage.
But these workers, known as “digital escorts,” often lack the technical expertise to police foreign engineers with far more advanced skills, ProPublica found. Some are former military personnel with little coding experience who are paid barely more than minimum wage for the work.
